Passive vs. Active RFID Tags

Passive vs. Active RFID Tags

Passive and Active RFID tags are different technologies that are often evaluated together.  Both RFID tags use Radio Frequency (RF) energy to communicate between the tag and readers.

Active RFID tags use an internal power source (battery) to continuously power the tag.  Their lifespan is determined by the power of the battery, once the battery fails, so does the tag.  They have very low signal strengths to communicate with the readers. Since they are continuously powered, they can be read within a range of 100 feet.  Active tags have a high data transmission rate, allowing thousands of tags to be read in at once within their read-range.  They also have low orientation sensitivity, allowing the reader to pick up multiple orientations during its read-time.  Active RFID tags are cost-heavy, often starting at $10/tag.  Typically active RFID tags can be found in place like consumer goods, vehicles, postal items, and retail pallets.

Passive RFID tags do not contain an internal power source, but rather are powered by a reader. This gives passive tags an unlimited lifespan.  They require high signal strength from the reader to respond.  Their read range is low, up to 20 feet. A few hundred can be read within their range. These tags have high orientation sensitivity, meaning it’s more difficult to read them in certain positions. Passive RFID tags are cost-effect, typically ranging from $0.15-$5.00/tag.  You would find passive tags in places such as healthcare, books, animal chips, and travel documents (passports). See how RFID tags can improve your data center audits.

 

Here’s a table showing a full comparison:

  Passive RFID Tags
Active RFID Tags
Power Source No internal power source; powered by the RFID reader’s signal.
Contains an internal power source (typically a battery) for signal transmission.
Read Range Shorter read range, typically up to 25 feet (7.6 meters).
Longer read range, often exceeding 100 feet (30 meters).
Cost Generally more cost-effective than active tags.
More expensive due to the added battery and longer-range capabilities.
Maintenance Maintenance-free; no battery replacement needed.
Batteries require periodic replacement, increasing ongoing costs.
Read Accuracy Typically less accurate due to shorter read range.
More accurate and reliable due to extended read range and constant power supply.
Application Scenarios Ideal for asset tracking within a confined space or proximity (e.g., inventory management).
Suited for tracking assets across large areas, outdoor applications, and real-time monitoring.
Battery Life N/A
Battery life varies but usually ranges from a few months to several years.
Real-Time Tracking Not designed for real-time tracking; batch processing is common.
Supports real-time tracking, providing constant updates on asset location.
Size Smaller and lighter, suitable for compact assets.
Larger and heavier due to the built-in battery; may be cumbersome for small items.
Environmental Considerations Limited ability to withstand extreme conditions.
More rugged and able to handle harsh environments.
Implementation Complexity Simpler deployment; often plug-and-play.
Requires more complex setup due to battery management and network integration.
Use Cases Retail inventory, supply chain, access control, and short-range asset tracking.
Logistics, vehicle tracking, wildlife monitoring, and long-range asset tracking.
Cost of Ownership Lower initial costs but may result in higher operational costs for frequent maintenance.
Higher initial investment, but lower operational costs due to extended battery life.

Few other things to consider are hardware, visibility and range, scanning processes, software requirements, durability (passive are more durable).

In specialized fields like chemical inventory, the choice between passive and active RFID tags is crucial. Learn how they integrate with chemical inventory management software.

Applications and Use Cases for Passive and Active RFID Tags

Passive RFID tags are ideal for retail environments, where their low cost and short read range suit inventory tracking. They’re used for tracking consumer goods, library books, and clothing items. In contrast, active RFID tags, with their longer read range and larger size, are suited for tracking high-value assets over larger areas. They’re commonly used in healthcare for monitoring patient movements and managing medical equipment, and in logistics for tracking goods in large warehouses or across supply chains.

Future Trends and Innovations in RFID Technology

The future of RFID technology is heading towards greater integration with the Internet of Things (IoT), enhancing the capabilities of both passive and active tags. Innovations in battery technology are expected to extend the lifespan of active RFID tags, making them more viable for long-term tracking solutions. Enhanced data storage and security features in passive tags will improve their applicability in sectors requiring detailed asset information. Upcoming trends include the development of smaller, more efficient tags and the use of RFID in combination with other technologies like AI and blockchain for improved asset management and security.

Passive RFID vs Active RFID: Verdict

Passive RFID tags are powered by an RFID reader or antenna and have a lower signal range than active RFID tags. They are commonly used for tracking inventory, supply chain management, and access control. They are also a cheaper option, with an average price of just $0.08 per tag. Passive RFID tags are ideal for things that are stored for extended periods of time or only need to be tracked for a short period.

Active RFID tags, on the other hand, have a built-in power source and can automatically broadcast their location to a reader. They are commonly used in processes to track assets in real-time, such as vehicle tracking and tolling. Active RFID tags have a larger read range, with a signal range of up to 150 meters, and are the best choice for real-time tracking. However, they are more expensive than passive RFID tags.

In summary, the choice between passive and active RFID tags depends on the specific tracking needs and budget. For short-term tracking of inventory or access control, passive RFID tags are a cost-effective option. For real-time tracking of high-value assets, active RFID tags are the better choice.

Asset Tracking Software
Need Help?

FAQ